Black Patients are More Likely to Undergo Early Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Matched Cohort Regardless of Surgeon Experience.

BACKGROUND: Black patients are at an increased risk of aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) when compared to White patients. The goal of this study was to determine whether racial disparities in revision TKA risk are related to surgeon characteristics. METHODS: This was an observational cohort study. We used inpatient administrative data to identify Black patients who underwent unilateral primary TKA in New York State. There were 21,948 Black patients who were matched 1:1 to White patients on age, sex, ethnicity, and insurance type. The primary outcome was aseptic revision TKA within 2 years of primary TKA. We calculated annual surgeon TKA volume and identified surgeon characteristics such as training in North America, board certification, and years of experience. RESULTS: Black patients had a higher odds of aseptic revision TKA (odds ratio (OR) 1.32, 95% CI 1.12-1.54, P < .001) and were disproportionately cared for by low volume surgeons (≤12 TKA/year). The relationship between low volume surgeons and risk of aseptic revision was not statistically significant (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.72-2.11, P = .436). The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for aseptic revision TKA in Black versus White patients varied across surgeon/hospital TKA volume category pairs, with the greatest aOR when TKA were performed by the highest volume surgeons at the highest volume hospitals (aOR 2.8, 95% CI 0.98- 8.09, P = .055). CONCLUSION: Black patients were more likely to undergo aseptic TKA revision than matched White patients. This disparity was not explained by surgeon characteristics.

Assessment of Racial Disparities in the Risks of Septic and Aseptic Revision Total Knee Replacements.

Importance: Black patients are at higher risk of revision total knee replacement (TKR) than White patients, but whether racial disparities exist for both septic and aseptic revision TKR and the reason for any disparities are unknown. Objective: To assess the risk of septic and aseptic revision TKR in Black and White patients and to examine interactions among race and socioeconomic and hospital-related variables that are associated with revision TKR risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included residents of New York, California, and Florida who underwent TKR. Patient-level data were obtained from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System, California's Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Patient Discharge Database, and Florida's Healthcare Utilization Project State Inpatient Database from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2014. Community characteristics were calculated from the US Census and linked to discharges by patient zip code. American Hospital Association Annual Survey data were linked to discharges using hospital identifiers. The analyses were performed from March 1 to October 30, 2020, with subsequent analyses in April 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to measure the association of race with septic and aseptic revision TKR. Results: A total of 722 492 patients underwent primary TKR, of whom 445 616 (61.68%) were female and 61 092 (8.46%) were Black. Black patients were at higher risk of septic (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.20) and aseptic (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.33-1.46) revision TKR compared with White patients. Other risk factors for septic revision TKR were diabetes (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.17-1.30), obesity (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.17-1.30), kidney disease (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.29-1.57), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15-1.30), inflammatory arthritis (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.39-1.69), surgical site complications during the index TKR (HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.87-2.56), Medicaid insurance (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.31), and low annual TKR volume at the hospital where the index TKR was performed (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.41-1.68). Risk factors for aseptic revision TKR were male sex (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06), workers' compensation insurance (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.51-1.72), and low hospital TKR volume (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07-1.22). Patients with obesity had a lower risk of aseptic TKR revision (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.84). In an analysis within each category of hospital TKR volume, the HR for aseptic revision among Black vs White patients was 1.20 (95% CI, 1.04-1.37) at very-low-volume hospitals (≤89 TKRs annually) compared with 1.68 (95% CI, 1.48-1.90) at very-high-volume hospitals (≥645 TKRs annually). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, Black patients were at significantly higher risk of aseptic revision TKR and, to a lesser extent, septic revision TKR compared with White patients. Racial disparities in aseptic revision risk were greatest at hospitals with very high TKR volumes.

When Has a Knee or Hip Replacement Failed? A Patient Perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To define the patient perspective of what constitutes a failure of total joint replacement (TJR) in a qualitative study. METHODS: We used the nominal group technique (NGT) with participants who had undergone elective total hip replacements (THR) and/or total knee replacements (TKR) to answer the question, "When would you consider a knee or hip replacement to be a failure?" RESULTS: We performed 8 nominal groups with 42 participants, all of whom had undergone THR and/or TKR between 2016 and 2018. Of these, 48% were male, 17% were Black, 79% had college education or above, and 76% had had osteoarthritis as the underlying diagnosis. The nominated responses/themes that were ranked the highest by the participants were as follows: (1) refractory index joint pain (80 votes); (2) occurrence of postoperative adverse events (54 votes); (3) unable to resume normal activities or go back to work (38 votes); (4) little or no improvement in quality of life (35 votes); (5) early revision surgery (35 votes); (6) death (7 votes); and (7) other, including nurse or physician negligence (2 votes) and expectation-outcome mismatch (1 vote). CONCLUSION: Lack of relief of pain or restoration of function or quality of life, or the occurrence of surgical complications after TJR were defined as TJR failure by participants. Functional TJR failure seems as important or more important than surgical failure. This patient perspective emphasizing pain, function, satisfaction, adverse events, and revision as critical domain components of TJR failure independently validated their inclusion in the TJR core domain set for clinical trials in people undergoing knee or hip TJR.

The Patients' Perspective of Important Glucocorticoid Effects: A Nominal Group Study Among Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Myositis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The objective of this cohort study was to understand the positive and negative effects of glucocorticoids (GCs) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and myositis from the patients' perspective with the aim of developing a patient-reported outcome measure. METHODS: Included patients were asked to participate in 1 of 5 nominal groups where demographic information and a quality-of-life questionnaire were collected. Patients were asked 2 open-ended questions on (1) benefits and (2) harms related to GC use. We used the Nominal Group Technique, a highly structured consensus method in which responses are generated, shared, and ranked. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results. Nominal group sessions took place from April to May 2019. RESULTS: Of 206 patients who were approached, 21 patients participated, 17 with systemic lupus erythematosus and 4 with myositis, predominantly women with more than 10 years of steroid use. The domains ranked highest for GC benefits were disease control (55 votes), fast onset of action (30 votes), increased energy (10 votes), and pain relief (10 votes). The highest-ranked negative effects were bone loss (38 votes) and weight gain (16 votes); psychological effects and damaged internal organs each received 12 votes. CONCLUSIONS: The top-ranked GC effects-both benefits and harms-among patients with systemic rheumatic disease are consistent with the top domains associated with GC use reported with other inflammatory diseases. This study informs the development of a comprehensive patient-reported outcome measure that can be used across inflammatory diseases.

Tranexamic Acid Does Not Reduce the Risk of Transfusion in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receive transfusions more often than patients with osteoarthritis following lower extremity total joint arthroplasty (TJA), but mitigating factors are not described. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is widely used to reduce blood loss in patients undergoing TJA, but its effect on transfusion rates in patients with RA has not been studied. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from a prospectively collected cohort of patients with RA undergoing TJA. Disease activity measured by Clinical Disease Activity Index, patient-reported outcome measures, and serologies was obtained. Baseline characteristics were summarized and compared. Transfusion requirements and TXA usage were obtained from chart review. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with transfusion in RA patients undergoing TJA. RESULTS: The cohort included 252 patients, mostly women with longstanding RA and end-stage arthritis requiring TJA. In multivariate analysis, 1 g/dL decrease in baseline hemoglobin (odds ratio [OR] = 0.394, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.232, 0.669], P = .001), 1-minute increase in surgical duration (OR = 1.022, 95% CI [1.008, 1.037], P = .003), and 1-point increase in Clinical Disease Activity Index (OR = 1.079, 95% CI [1.001, 1.162]) were associated with increased risk of transfusion. TXA use was not associated with decreased risk of postoperative transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative health optimization should include assessment and treatment of anemia in RA patients before TJA, as preoperative hemoglobin level is the main risk factor for postoperative transfusion. Increased disease activity and increased surgical time were independent risk factors for postoperative transfusion but are less modifiable. While TXA did not decrease transfusion risk in this population, a prospective trial is needed to confirm this. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Subarticular Inflammatory Pseudoabscesses: A Pathologic Study With Clinical Correlation.

Abnormal accumulation of neutrophils in a subarticular bone usually raises the concern for osteomyelitis or septic arthritis, a disabling and potentially life-threatening medical condition. At the pathology department of a specialized orthopedic institute, we observed a distinct pattern of subarticular inflammation mimicking infection characterized by collections of neutrophils, macrophages, and fibrin in pseudocystic spaces of variable size and extent in the superficial subarticular bone not accompanied by granulation tissue or necrosis. We coined the term "inflammatory pseudoabscess" to describe these accumulations. From 1997-2015, we reported inflammatory pseudoabscesses in 157 primary arthroplasty/osteotomy specimens from 143 patients without penetrating trauma or hardware in the affected joint. The predominant gross and histologic features were those of destructive/inflammatory joint disease, including lymphoplasmacytic synovitis (95.3%), subchondral osseous chronic inflammation (80.3%), exudative synovitis (58.0%), synovial pannus (52.0%), and marginal erosions of articular cartilage and/or subarticular bone (43.3%). Clinical information was available in 137 (95.8%) patients, 107 (overall: 74.8%) of whom had preoperatively or postoperatively diagnosed inflammatory arthropathy, most commonly rheumatoid arthritis. The remaining 30 (overall: 21.0%) patients had no documented inflammatory disorders, but some had bilateral or multijoint arthropathy, hands/feet involvement, lymphoplasmacytic synovitis, ulcerative colitis, or family history of inflammatory arthropathy. There was no documented infection-associated implant failure. We believe that inflammatory pseudoabscess represents an intraosseous manifestation of noninfectious inflammatory disorders of joints. This feature should be recognized by pathologists and used to suggest further clinical evaluation for undiagnosed inflammatory joint diseases.

Patients' perspectives of outcomes after total knee and total hip arthroplasty: a nominal group study.

BACKGROUND: While total joint replacements (TJR) are frequently performed, there is little qualitative research to define the outcomes most important to patients. METHODS: Patients who had received total hip (THR) or total knee replacements (TKR) participated in 8 nominal groups to answer the question "What result/results matter the most to a patient undergoing/having a knee or hip replacement?" Total 270 votes were allocated. RESULTS: Eight nominal groups were performed with 45 patients, 6 groups with mean age (71.1 ± 9.3), and 2 with 9 younger patients (mean age 36.8 ± 7.4). All had TJR between 2016 and 2018; overall, 40% were male, 15.6% were Black, and 75% were performed for osteoarthritis. While all groups ranked the same top 3 outcomes, responses varied with age: 1) relief of pain (46% vs. 35% in the young groups); 2) improved function including mobility (29% vs. 18% in the young groups); 3) restored quality of life (13% vs 33% of votes in the younger group). CONCLUSION: Relief of pain and restoration of function, and improved quality of life are the 3 outcomes ranked highest by patients, confirming their inclusion in TJR clinical trials.

Rheumatoid Arthritis Flares After Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty: Outcomes at One Year.

OBJECTIVE: Most patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have active RA and report postoperative flares; whether RA disease activity or flares increase the risk of worse pain and function scores 1 year later is unknown. METHODS: Patients with RA were enrolled before THA/TKA. Patient-reported outcomes, including the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)/Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and physician assessments of disease characteristics and activity (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints [DAS28] and Clinical Disease Activity Index), were collected before surgery. Patient-reported outcomes were repeated at 1 year. Postoperative flares were identified using the RA Flare Questionnaire weekly for 6 weeks and were defined by concordance between patient report plus physician assessment. We compared baseline characteristics and HOOS/KOOS scores using 2-sample t-test/Wilcoxon's rank sum test as well as chi-square/Fisher's exact tests. We used multivariate linear and logistic regression to determine the association of baseline characteristics, disease activity, and flares with 1-year outcomes. RESULTS: One-year HOOS/KOOS scores were available for 122 patients (56 with THA and 66 with TKA). Although HOOS/KOOS pain was worse for patients who experienced a flare within 6 weeks of surgery, absolute improvement was not different. In multivariable models, baseline DAS28 predicted 1-year HOOS/KOOS pain and function; each 1-unit increase in DAS28 worsened 1-year pain by 2.41 (SE 1.05; P = 0.02) and 1-year function by 4.96 (SE 1.17; P = 0.0001). Postoperative flares were not independent risk factors for pain or function scores. CONCLUSION: Higher disease activity increased the risk of worse pain and function 1 year after arthroplasty, but postoperative flares did not.

Histologic and Transcriptional Evidence of Subclinical Synovial Inflammation in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Clinical Remission.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical remission may have subclinical synovial inflammation. This study was undertaken to determine the proportion of patients with RA in remission or with low disease activity at the time of arthroplasty who had histologic or transcriptional evidence of synovitis, and to identify clinical features that distinguished patients as having subclinical synovitis. METHODS: We compared Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) to synovial histologic features in 135 patients with RA undergoing arthroplasty. We also compared DAS28 scores to RNA-Seq data in a subset of 35 patients. RESULTS: Fourteen percent of patients met DAS28 criteria for clinical remission (DAS28 <2.6), and another 15% met criteria for low disease activity (DAS28 <3.2). Histologic analysis of synovium revealed synovitis in 27% and 31% of samples from patients in remission and patients with low disease activity, respectively. Patients with low disease activity and synovitis also exhibited increased C-reactive protein (CRP) (P = 0.0006) and increased anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibody levels (P = 0.03) compared to patients without synovitis. Compared to patients with a "low inflammatory synovium" subtype, 183 genes were differentially expressed in the synovium of patients with subclinical synovitis. The majority of these genes (86%) were also differentially expressed in the synovium of patients with clinically active disease (DAS28 ≥3.2). CONCLUSION: Thirty-one percent of patients with low clinical disease activity exhibited histologic evidence of subclinical synovitis, which was associated with increased CRP and anti-CCP levels. Our findings suggest that synovial gene expression signatures of clinical synovitis are present in patients with subclinical synovitis.

Diagnosing Prosthetic Joint Infections in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis: A Systematic Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) are at increased risk of prosthetic joint infections (PJI), yet differentiating between septic and aseptic failure is a challenge. The aim of our systematic review is to evaluate synovial biomarkers and their efficacy at diagnosing PJI in patients with IA. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed in the following databases from inception to January 2018: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Searches across the databases retrieved 367 results. Two of 5 reviewers independently screened a total of 298 citations. Discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. Twenty articles fit our criteria, but due to methodological differences findings could not be pooled for meta-analysis. For 5 studies, raw data were provided, pooled, and used to derive optimal diagnostic cut points. RESULTS: Our final analysis included 1861 non-IA patients, including 426 patients with PJI, and 90 IA patients of whom 26 had PJI. There was a significant difference among the 4 groups for serum C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and synovial CRP, polymorphonuclear neutrophil percent, white blood cells, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and IL-1b. Polymorphonuclear neutrophil percent had the highest sensitivity (95.2%) and specificity (85.0%) to detect infections with an optimum threshold of 78%. CONCLUSION: While levels of synovial white blood cells, IL-6, IL-8, and serum CRP appear higher in patients with IA, there is overlap with those who are not infected. Further studies are needed to explore diagnostic tests that will better detect PJI in patients with IA.